vancouver-west-end-tenants-fighting-more-phony-evictions
| | | | |

Vancouver West End tenants fighting more phony evictions

ByCharlie Carey

Posted September 13, 2024 7:48 am. Last Updated September 13, 2024 12:00 pm. A Vancouver landlord with a history of losing tenancy board hearings recently lost another attempt to evict a renter from Park Beach Manor in the West End in late August, but some neighbours at the apartment say they’re still fighting phony evictions and harassment from the landlord. Park Beach Manor tenants and other supporters from the Vancouver Tenants’ Union crashed the doors of Plan A Real Estate – their corporate landlord – in Downtown Vancouver Thursday afternoon. “I’m delivering this letter on behalf of the Park Beach tenant collective, demanding you to drop the recent evictions for Jody and Jen,” said a tenant to a Plan A staff member, who opened the office door. “We have information they’re based on false information, mismanagement by Plan A’s payment platform and communication.” CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO 1130 NEWSRADIO VANCOUVER LIVE! Park Beach Manor resident Paul Kot says some of his neighbours braced themselves when they heard Plan A was going to buy their apartment earlier this year. For months, supporters have been campaigning against Plan A’s alleged actions. “A lot of us do not feel safe in our own homes,” said Kot. Kot says the BC Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB) has granted two orders of repossession in his building, which gives the landlord the right to take back the units. He says another case has been granted an interim stay, which lets the tenant live in the unit until the judicial system can review the case. “There’s a lot of falsified information,” said Kot. “The two judges that sided for the interim stay have stated that there’s strong merit to the tenant’s case, since they were granted interim stay. So, I think the fact that the justice system does recognize that there’s merit to these cases, shows that Plan A doesn’t have very much to stand on.” Speaking to CityNews over the phone, Plan A’s managing broker Anoop Majithia says these tenants represent a small, vocal minority at the building, and maintains that Plan A has a good relationship with the majority of its renters. “We don’t actively go around harassing tenants or pick fights with tenants – we’re a professional landlord, we have hundreds of properties, and that’s not the way we conduct ourselves,” he said. But Kot alleges that Plan A gave false information to the RTB for its recent eviction rulings. Documents provided to the RTB. (CityNews Image / Kier Junos) A receipt showing the tenant’s August rent was paid in full. (CityNews Image / Kier Junos) That included a document showing a tenant didn’t pay enough rent in August, while a payment receipt from the same date shows the complete amount was paid. CityNews hasn’t been able to verify the accuracy of these documents, but as RTB information officer tells CityNews if a tenant feels concerned about fraudulent or incomplete evidence, they can make an appeal “Get together. Communicate with your neighbours,” said Kot. “Because at the end of the day, when a landlord comes in like this and harasses you and threatens you – it strips away your right to quiet enjoyment, and that should never be allowed.”

rent-increase-of-23.5%-approved-for-landlord:-rtb
| | | | | |

Rent increase of 23.5% approved for landlord: RTB

Bymichael

Posted August 13, 2024 11:24 am. Last Updated August 13, 2024 11:42 am. Are the high interest rates of the last few years a reason enough to allow landlords to increase rents above the allowable limit? The Residential Tenancy Branch said that was the case in at least one ruling, where one landlord was approved to hike rents by 23.5 per cent over two years. In a decision posted earlier this year , the RTB said the landlords’ application for an additional increase of that amount over two years was approved, adding they “must impose this increase in accordance with the Act and the Regulation.” “I find the Landlords have been successful. They have proven, on a balance of probabilities, all the elements required to be able to impose an additional rent increase for a financial loss for financing costs of purchasing the residential property under section 23 of the Regulation,” the ruling reads. “The Landlords seek an additional rent increase of 23.5%. Section 23(4) of the Regulation states when considering an additional rent increase application for a financial loss for financing costs of purchasing the residential property, the director may order that the increase granted under subsection (1) be phased in over a period of time. I find this rent increase significant in one installment, and I order it may be applied over two years.” The RTB ruled that in the first year, the landlords were allowed to raise rents for each of the four units by 3.5 per cent — the annual allowable — plus an additional 12 per cent. The second year could rise by whatever the provincial maximum is set at, plus 11.5 per cent. The board explains that a landlord can apply for additional rent increases “if they, acting reasonably, have incurred a financial loss for the financing costs of purchasing the residential property, if the financing costs could not have been foreseen under reasonable circumstances.” The RTB says the landlords in this situation purchased the fourplex rental property — their first such building — in October 2021. Initially, their borrowing rate was 1.9 per cent “The landlords testified that they have always used a variable rate mortgage and at the time of setting up the mortgage, the rates had been stable. At the time, there was no definitive indication that the interest rate would increase as much as it did,” the board wrote. By July 2023, the RTB says the landlords’ mortgage rate jumped to 6.65 per cent. As of May 2024, the RTB said the landlords’ rate remained 6.65 per cent. Fixing their mortgage in 2023 was reportedly not an option, with the RTB saying the landlords’ noted they were “too early in their mortgage term” and that doing so would incur a penalty that was “very large.” However, tenants cited in the RTB’s decision argued that it was “reasonably foreseeable that the rate will change,” as the landlords had a variable rate mortgage. “The Landlords should enter these kinds of financing circumstances with a cushion to absorb the rate variability,” they said. “The Landlords reached out to the Tenants in April 2023 and asked if they would be agreeable to an additional rent increase over the annual allowable limit. Tenant M.S. said the Landlords asked the Tenants for a $500.00 per month increase. The Tenants were not agreeable. Some Tenants argued that this is the Landlords’ investment, so how can this be classified as a loss when the Landlords are ‘going to come away with a million dollar house,’” the ruling reads. As a standard, landlords in B.C. may only increase rents annually to a certain cap set by the provincial government. For 2024, the maximum was set at 3.5 per cent. “Tenants must pay the increased rent, unless the increase is unlawful,” the province states on its website. “Landlords can only increase rent if they provide tenants with at least 3 full months notice. Rent can only be increased once every 12 months and must be within the yearly rent increase limit, as set by the Residential Tenancy Branch.” LandlordBC CEO David Hutniak was not available for an interview. While he was unable to review this decision specifically, he tells 1130 NewsRadio via email that “our sector is experiencing huge fiscal challenges due to the escalating operational costs especially those out of our control like taxes, insurance, utilities, and fees.” “High interest rates have exacerbated an already bad situation. Furthermore, a steady stream of regulation, layered upon layer, with rent control being the most notable, are pushing more and more rental housing providers to abandon the sector” Hutniak wrote. “So although I’ve not reviewed this specific decision, the challenges this rental housing provider has experienced I know are not unique and the approved increase is likely deficient. Nevertheless, it is encouraging to see an Arbitrator at the RTB recognize the need to make the ruling that they did.” 1130 NewsRadio has reached out to the Ministry of Housing and the Tenant Resource and Advisory Centre for comment.